Super Mario Epic

Super Mario Epic Review

Overview

Super Mario Epic presents a deeply polarized experience that leaves players sharply divided. While some find nostalgic enjoyment in its attempt to recreate classic Mario magic, others encounter a fundamentally flawed imitation that frustrates more than it delights. The game captures the superficial essence of Mario adventures but stumbles in executing core mechanics, resulting in an experience that feels simultaneously familiar and alienating. This tension between aspiration and execution defines the Super Mario Epic journey, creating a game that only the most forgiving Mario enthusiasts might appreciate.

Not even sure you can class this as a Mario clone. Sure the miniature graphics may resemble Mario, but in very few other ways does it offer the look or feel of a Mario game.

HeRaDiN

A Mario Experience in Name Only

The game's most glaring departure from Mario tradition lies in its combat mechanics. Unlike classic Mario games where jumping on enemies delivers satisfying defeats, Super Mario Epic forces players to rely exclusively on fire power-ups for combat. This fundamental design choice removes one of the franchise's most iconic and enjoyable interactions, replacing tactile platforming action with awkward projectile dependence. The substitution creates constant frustration, especially when fire flowers are scarce. This design misstep transforms enemies from playful obstacles into tedious barriers, undermining the core platforming rhythm that defines Mario's appeal.

Adding to the dissonance is the unconventional health system. While some players appreciate the health bar as a welcome innovation preventing instant deaths, this addition fundamentally alters the risk-reward balance of platforming. Traditional Mario tension evaporates when players can absorb multiple hits, diminishing the satisfaction of precise jumps and careful navigation. The health mechanic feels grafted from a different genre, creating cognitive dissonance for anyone expecting authentic Mario gameplay.

Visual and Audio Identity Crisis

Super Mario Epic's presentation exists in a confusing middle ground between homage and imitation. The miniature graphics capture Mario's aesthetic at a surface level but lack the charm and polish of Nintendo's artistry. Environments feel flat and underdesigned, with background elements that fail to create a cohesive world. Character sprites resemble familiar Mario enemies but feature odd redesigns that unsettle rather than delight. The visual package suggests Mario without truly embodying him, like seeing your favorite character through warped glass.

The audio design compounds these issues with perplexing creative choices. Jump sounds feel abrasive and out-of-place rather than satisfying, while enemy noises seem imported from unrelated games. Most jarring is the soundtrack, which directly lifts melodies from Super Mario World, Super Mario Bros 3, and Mario Kart 64 without integrating them cohesively. This creates a disjointed audio collage that constantly reminds players they're experiencing a derivative work rather than a thoughtfully crafted homage. The borrowed nostalgia feels cheap rather than earned, highlighting the game's lack of original identity.

The sounds appear to be another nationality which I can't quite place and the general physics of the game differ to Mario.

HeRaDiN

Structural Flaws and Technical Shortcomings

Beyond its mechanical and presentation issues, Super Mario Epic suffers from significant structural problems. The absence of any save system forces players to restart entire levels upon death, turning challenging sections into exercises in frustration. This archaic design choice ignores decades of quality-of-life improvements expected in modern platformers. Combined with occasionally unfair enemy placement and unclear progression paths, the game frequently punishes players rather than rewarding skill.

Technical issues further undermine the experience. Players report bugs like the ability to hang inexplicably from ceilings, breaking level design. Collision detection proves inconsistent, particularly during precision jumps where Mario sometimes passes through platforms or takes damage without enemy contact. While not game-breaking, these glitches accumulate into a pervasive sense of instability. The performance varies across hardware, with some systems handling the modest graphics smoothly while others struggle inexplicably.

Moments of Redeeming Fun

Despite its overwhelming flaws, Super Mario Epic contains isolated bright spots that hint at what might have been. The level design occasionally captures the expansive spirit of classic Mario adventures, with some stages offering satisfying exploration opportunities. When the fire flower power-up appears, combat briefly achieves a satisfying rhythm, letting players mow through enemies with cartoonish flair. These moments provide temporary enjoyment, particularly for players who approach the game with low expectations.

The most compelling praise comes from younger players and families discovering Mario-style gameplay for the first time. Several reviewers mention children enjoying the colorful visuals and simple objectives, suggesting the game might serve as an introductory platformer for very young audiences. The inclusion of a health bar lowers the skill ceiling significantly, creating a more accessible experience for casual gamers intimidated by traditional Mario difficulty. These redeeming qualities remain fragile, however, constantly undermined by the game's more fundamental issues.

This game has really out-done itself. It has background music from Super Mario World, Super Mario Bros 3 and Mario Kart 64. The graphics and characters are great too.

The WWE Undisputed Champi

The Divisive Verdict

Super Mario Epic's reception reveals a fascinating split between players willing to overlook its flaws and those devastated by its shortcomings. Some Mario devotees appreciate any attempt to bring the franchise spirit to PC, however imperfect. These forgiving players focus on nostalgic elements like familiar music and enemy designs, embracing the game as a charming fan project rather than a professional product.

Conversely, many players feel betrayed by the game's misleading Mario branding. The mechanical deviations from franchise fundamentals create profound disappointment for those expecting authentic Mario gameplay. This group views Super Mario Epic not as a loving tribute but as a cynical asset-flip trading on Nintendo's goodwill. The intensity of this backlash reflects how deeply the game misunderstands what makes Mario timeless: precise controls, satisfying feedback loops, and carefully crafted challenges that reward mastery.

The one thing that I hate in this game is Mario isn't able to jump on the enemies. I mean, without jumping on the enemies how could you say that we are playing Mario?

Shalini

Final Thoughts

Super Mario Epic stands as a cautionary tale about the challenges of recreating iconic gameplay. While containing brief flashes of competent platforming and nostalgic appeal, the game falters in too many fundamental areas to recommend broadly. The combat system betrays Mario's essence, the presentation feels cheaply derivative, and technical issues undermine already shaky mechanics. Only the most undemanding players or curious Mario historians will find lasting enjoyment here. For others, the experience serves as a reminder of how difficult great platforming is to achieve - and how effortlessly Nintendo makes it look.